Archive for the 'Robotic Fabrication' Category

Hyperbody Workshop on Robotic Fabrication

robotic fabrication ac9b173bab 250x357 Hyperbody Workshop on Robotic FabricationWes McGee to teach a work­shop with Dave Pigram on Robotic Fab­ri­ca­tion as part of the Hyper­body Work­shop Series at TU Delft.

The work­shop with Wes McGee [ mat­ter design stu­dioTaub­mann Col­lege of Archi­tec­ture ] and Dave Pigram [ super­manou­vre / uni­ver­sity of tech­nol­ogy syd­ney] explores the idea of funic­u­lar struc­tures cou­pled with the robotic hotwire cut­ting process. Hotwire cut­ting is a highly effec­tive and rel­a­tively novel approach to the pro­duc­tion of vol­ume and is highly effec­tive in the pro­duc­tion of vol­u­met­ric ele­ments of EPS foam. The work­shop explores the poten­tial of EPS form­work while revis­it­ing the idea of half-timber struc­tures. Part of the form­work will be come struc­tural, part of it remains within the struc­ture, part of the form­work will be dis­posed off / recycled.

The work­shop is open to a lim­ited num­ber of exter­nal stu­dents at a rea­son­able fee of €150, includ­ing work­shop materials.

Large Format Additive Fabrication

As part of the Fall 2009 Robotic Fab­ri­ca­tion course, stu­dents chal­lenged the tra­di­tional lim­i­ta­tions of the 3d print­ing process. One big lim­i­ta­tion is the scale/cost ratio. Sev­eral researchers have pro­posed building-sized fab­ri­ca­tion machines, but all rely on mas­sive gantry-type machines….massive in cost and lim­ited in mobility.

This project seeks to pro­pose the process not just for full scale mod­el­ing, but instead for the full scale fab­ri­ca­tion of actual build­ing com­po­nents. The process is a hybrid between addi­tive and sub­trac­tive tech­niques to cre­ate a net-shape build­ing com­po­nent. This part can then be coated as well as filled inter­nally to pro­vide struc­ture and sur­face rigid­ity. Prece­dents include the typ­i­cal ICF con­crete forms as well as the foam core com­pos­ites used in high end struc­tures requir­ing dou­ble cur­va­ture. Even if used sim­ply as a mold pro­duc­tion process, the mate­r­ial sav­ings occurs from elim­i­nat­ing a major­ity of the waste cre­ated in a purely sub­trac­tive process such as milling EPS foam blocks for molds. The abil­ity to extrude a tool­ing paste over the sur­face has already been proven in the aero­space and wind tur­bine fab­ri­ca­tion industries.

Cer­tainly the topo­log­i­cal free­dom of 3d print­ing has already been proven, but not at the build­ing scale. Inte­grated elec­tri­cal and mechan­i­cal pas­sages are just one pos­si­bil­ity. The capa­bil­ity to cre­ate lim­ited over­hang with­out a sup­port­ing scaf­fold is also a major advan­tage, requir­ing the abil­ity to angle the extru­sion noz­zle. Future research includes the appli­ca­tion of GFRC/P (glass fiber rein­forced con­crete or poly­mer) coat­ings as well as back-filling struc­tural rein­force­ment into the voids created.

Stu­dent cred­its
Lead: Kris Wal­ters
Team:Les Key, Jae Ryong Oh, Jonathan Puff, Dan Weissman